Daniels and Sampson licensed private investigator

 

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT:

There has been a recent and important development and discovery by the Constitutionalists regarding Obama eligibility issue, and specifically his Social Security Number. First though it is neccessary to understand the backstory and provide some context. So a historical article is shown italacized and indented below to help understand the significance of the “new” discovery.

• Understanding the Backstory: Investigators: Obama uses Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number – 3 experts insist White House answer new questions about documentation – May 11, 2010 By Jerome R. Corsi © 2011 WorldNetDaily

NEW YORK – Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.  WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.

The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.

The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.

“Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office,” the Social Security website explains. “The first three (3) digits of a person’s social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number.”

The question is being raised amid speculation about the president’s history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation (must read link /SD). Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.

Robert Siciliano, president and CEO of IDTheftSecurity.com and a nationally recognized expert on identity theft, agrees the Social Security number should be questioned.

“I know Social Security numbers have been issued to people in states where they don’t live, but there’s usually a good reason the person applied for a Social Security number in a different state,” Siciliano told WND.

WND asked Siciliano whether he thought the question was one the White House should answer.   “Yes,” he replied. “In the case of President Obama, I really don’t know what the good reason would be that he has a Social Security number issued in Connecticut when we know he was a resident of Hawaii.”   [Siciliano is a frequent expert guest on identify theft on cable television networks, including CNN, CNBC and the Fox News Channel].

Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.   WND has further confirmed that the Social Security number in question links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service System.  Inserting the Social Security number, his birth date and his last name produces a valid Selective Service number.  (You can check for yourself)

To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama’s were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.

“There is obviously a case of fraud going on here,” Daniels maintained. “In 15 years of having a private investigator’s license in Ohio, I’ve never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly.”

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?  “Never,” Daniels said. “It’s against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued.”  Daniels said she is “staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama’s use of this Social Security number is fraudulent.”   There is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.

Nor is there any suggestion in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams from My Father,” that he ever had a Connecticut address.   Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Obama visited Connecticut during his high-school years.   Sampson’s affidavit specifies that as a result of his formal training as an immigration officer and his 27-year career in professional law enforcement, “it is my knowledge and belief that Social Security numbers can only be applied for in the state in which the applicant habitually resides and has their official residence.”

Daniels told WND she believes Obama had a different Social Security number when he worked as a teenager in Hawaii prior to 1977.

“I doubt this is President Obama’s originally issued Social Security number,” she told WND. “Obama has a work history in Hawaii before he left the islands to attend college at Occidental College in California, so he must have originally been issued a Social Security number in Hawaii.”

The published record available about Obama indicates his first job as a teenager in Hawaii was at a Baskin-Robbins in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu. USA Today reported the ice-cream shop still was in operation one year after Obama’s inauguration.  Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of the number in question.

“It is a crime to use more than one Social Security number, and Barack Obama had to have a previous Social Security number to have worked at Baskin-Robbins,” she insisted. “Under current law, a person is not permitted to use more than one Social Security number in a lifetime.”

Another anomaly in the law enforcement databases searched by Daniels and Sampson is that the date 1890 shows up in the field indicating the birth of the number holder, along with Obama’s birth date of 08/04/1961.  A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama’s birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.

Daniels disclosed to WND the name of the database she searched and produced a computer screen copy of the page that listed 1890 as a date associated with the 042 Social Security number.

(This is important, remember these two paragraphs and the date 1890 to grasp the importance of  the new discovery…../SD)

Daniels said she can’t be sure if the 1890 figure has any significance. But she said it appears the number Obama is using was previously issued by the Social Security Administration.   After an extensive check of the proprietary databases she uses as a licensed private investigator, Daniels determined that the first occurrence of Obama’s association with the number was in 1986 in Chicago.

Daniels assumes, but cannot prove, that Obama took on a previously issued Social Security number that had gone dormant due to the death of the original holder.   Daniels has been a licensed private investigator in Ohio since 1995.  Sampson formed his private investigations firm, CSI Consulting and Investigations, in 2008. He previously worked as a deportations law enforcement officer with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The Daniels and Sampson affidavits were originally recorded by attorney Orly Taitz in an eligibility case against Obama last year.  (read full article here)

Now we get to the latest development.   I’m still trying to track down all of the linkage and independently verify, but so far I gotta say this article (below) seems completely factually correct and legit.   Remember the important date from the WND article above with only a casual reference?  1890 keeps showing up as an additional date when you research Obama.   “1890″ what possible reason for 1890?    Read on…….
BAD NEWS FOR OBAMA -  Year 1890 Social Security NUMBER TRACED TO “JOHN PAUL LUDWIG” -  This news is breaking: This is bad news for Obama.

This is what we know so far.  We get more info on Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, had Connedicut Social Security Number (SSN) obtained in 1976 and died in Hawaii around 1981.  There are two (2) Social Security numbers for him and records show him dying in two (2) different states: California (CA) and Hawaii (HI) around 1981.

The reason this is important, is because there is a similar fact pattern to President Obama. Barack Obama is residing today in the White House, using CT SS number 042-68-4425, issued in CT in and around March 1977 to an elderly individual named John Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, who is presumed dead and whose death was either never reported to the SS administration, or it was reported and deleted from the database by someone.

Obama’s maternal grandmother Madelyn Dunham, worked as a part-timer or volunteer in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse.  Thus she would have access to the estate files of anyone who died there. Thus if the elderly man originally from CT died “intestate” in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died.   Thus the SSN remained active for the deceased person and Obama could “adopt” it as his own. This is a clear case of identity theft at the federal level.

This is what we know about Ludwig:

• In 1924, Jean Paul Ludwig worked for Senator Reed of PA, in Washington DC.
• On the ship manifest of ‘Leviathan’, he listed Senator Reed in Washington, DC as his employer, in answer to where he intended to live in the US.
• Jean Paul Ludwig had been in the US for 3 yrs in 1924, but he was listed on the “Immigration” manifest and refered to as an alien in the column headings.
• Listed under “States Immigration Officer at Port of Arrival”, New York, Aug 12, 1924:
• Jean Paul Ludwig, Date of Arrival: Aug 12, 1924, Port of Departure:
  Cherbourg, France, Line#: 0008
• Line #8: By Whom was Passage Paid: Employer. Mr. Reed;
• Whether in possession of $50: Yes;
• Whether ever before in US: Yes;
• If Yes-Period of Years: 3;
• Where: PA
• Whether going to join relative or friend: Employer. Senator Reed, Washington, DC
• Length of time alien intends to remain in the US:  Always
• Height 5′5″
• Complexion Dk.
• Hair Brown.
• Eyes Brown.
• Marks of ID: None
• Place of Birth: France, Ammersville.

[link to www.ellisisland.org]

First Name: Jean P.
Last Name: Ludwig
Ethnicity: France
Last Place of Residence: Washington, D.C.
Date of Arrival: Aug 12, 1924
Age at Arrival: 34
Gender: M
Marital Status: S
Ship of Travel: Leviathan
Port of Departure: Cherbourg, France
Manifest Line Number: 0008

U.S. Social Security Death Index
Name: Jean Ludwig
Birth Date: 17 February 1890
Zip Code of Last Residence: 96816 (Honolulu,HI)
Death Date: June 1981
Estimated Age at Death: 91

Social Security Numbers were not used prior to 1930′s.  If this information on Mr. Ludwig passes the rigorous investigation currently being done, and if Mr. Ludwig only requested a Social Security Number in 1976 at the age of 85-86 for some medicare/medicaid benefit need, then obviously this brings several questions to mind:

• Why is President Obama using the SS# of a dead guy?
• How did Obama get the SS# of a dead guy?
• Why was the SS# of a dead guy used to fill out the Selective Service registration requirement?

Chew it over…   All the links are embedded.   What say you?