“THE GUY IS JUST WARMING UP”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Apr. 19, 2011) — On April 18, 2011, The Post & Email spoke with Dr. Orly Taitz just prior to the announced veto by Arizona Governor Janice Brewer of the legislation
which would have required candidates for the office of president to
provide proof of “natural born Citizenship” status. Since that time,
Taitz has launched a recall campaign against Brewer which can be signed by any Arizona registered voter.
On April 15, Taitz was interviewed
by John King of CNN, who labeled her “the leading figure in the birther
movement.” Before the interview commenced, King expressed skepticism
over the contention that the Arizona bill was not “aimed” at Barack
Hussein Obama. During the telecast, King admitted that what he called
the “Certificate of Live Birth,” which he held up to the cameras, is not
a complete birth record. He asked his other guest, a pollster, if “the
president has to do something more proactively” to convince the public
that he was born in Hawaii.
When Taitz held up documents which she
claimed proved that Obama is using a stolen social security number, the
pollster interrupted Taitz and claimed that her statements arose from
racism. When he asked Taitz if the eligibility question would have
arisen if Obama had been white, Taitz answered, “Yes.”
Concluding the interview, King stated
that “for better or worse,” the conversation would be continued at a
later date. The pollster commented that he opposed that idea.
Dr. Taitz told The Post & Email that she believes that Donald Trump will win the presdential nomination
of the Republican Party in 2012. “I have no doubt that he will get the
nomination and that people will be voting for him. You can see all the
polling. The guy is just warming up. He ran only for a couple of
weeks, and within two weeks, he has beaten all the competition and is 9%
ahead of his nearest opponent. I don’t think Romney will even run,
knowing that Trump is running.”
Taitz continued, “What worries me is
that we have massive election fraud. Today, we have two major companies
running the scanners for the voting machines: Diebold and Sequoia.
That’s what worries me, because American citizens have no access to the
software; we have no proof of how those ballots are being counted, and
I’m afraid that even though a majority of people will vote for Trump,
the powers that have this information in their hands will basically
steal the election by use of those ballot scanners and software that are
concealed and inaccessible from the American citizens. I hope that
people will support him in pushing not only for the unsealing of Obama’s
records, but also unsealing the software so that the United States can
continue going toward paper ballots and going toward manual counts and
not counting by machine.”
A study completed in 2006 showed that Diebold voting machines, in particular, are susceptible to sabotage. A 1996 report states that at that time, only 1.7% of the votes cast by “registered voters in the United States” were made on paper ballots.
The Post & Email asked Dr. Taitz if
she was aware that various groups have been coming out publicly and
charging Obama and members of his regime with treason, and she answered,
“People are talking about it, but I don’t know where it ultimately
leads. The fact that a person without any papers and a stolen social
security card was able to get in the White House back door and assume
the responsibility of running our military is, in my opinion, treason in
and of itself.
But it’s not enough just to talk about
it; we need to apply pressure from each and every citizen of this
country on our Congress to start an emergency hearing on the issue of
eligibility, of social security fraud of Mr. Obama, and demand that they
obtain the original application for the Connecticut social security
number when he was supposedly born in Hawaii, and his original birth
certificate and other documents. I think that will be the end of the
Obama presidency, and he will have to be removed from office.
We asked Dr. Taitz if she knew that
Donald Trump was going to speak out publicly about Obama’s missing birth
certificate, and she replied, “Well, I didn’t have an idea originally,
but what did happen was that when he came out, he said that he believed
that Mr. Obama was born in this country but that he should provide the
document. I provided a lot of information to him on the issue of social
security fraud, and the next day, he was on another show, and he said,
‘I received new information, and now I believe that he does not have
proper documents, that he was not born in this country.’ So at first
Trump thought he was born here, but after that, he changed his opinion.
I don’t know; it’s possible that it was because of other information
that he got…”
Dr. Taitz also reported that she had
flown to Arizona three times and given a lecture on presidential
eligibility, and that among the attendees were some of the people who
ultimately helped to write the Arizona eligibility bill.
It was reported
that Gov. Brewer acknowledged that the legislature might have enough
votes to override her veto of the bill. Of her reason(s) for vetoing
it, Brewer said,
“”As a former Secretary of State, I do not support designating one
person as a gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate, which could lead
to arbitrary or politically-motivated decisions.”
But isn’t a secretary of state expected to uphold the law?
Arizona’s constitution provides for removal from office of any public official:
Section 1. Every
public officer in the state of Arizona, holding an elective
office, either by election or appointment, is subject to recall
from such office by the qualified electors of the electoral district
from which candidates are elected to such office. Such electoral
district may include the whole state. Such number of said
electors as shall equal twenty-five per centum of the number of
votes cast at the last preceding general election for all of the
candidates for the office held by such officer, may by petition,
which shall be known as a recall petition, demand his recall.
No comments:
Post a Comment