Are you a “BIRTHER” or a “MARK”.

In the old neighborhood we would get a empty Sony TV box, glue cement blocks or bricks in it, reseal it and sell it on the street for $100.00 with the story that it was a $600.00 Sony TV that fell off a FedEx truck. Anyone that bought it without opening it was labeled a “Mark” A Bernie Madoff client, a Schmuck.

The ones that wanted to see what’s in the box before they bought it, today would be labeled a “Birther”

Are you a “BIRTHER” or a “MARK”. Do you believe Obama was born in Kapi’olani hospital? If you do I have a bridge I would like to sell you. It goes from Brooklyn to Manhattan, ready for a toll booth to be installed.

A “Mark” BELIEVED BILL CLINTON WHEN HE SAID: “I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN” Then they found the stained dress. He lied and they became a “Birther”.

A “Mark” BELIEVED JOHN EDWARDS WHEN HE SAID: “THAT’S NOT MY BABY” Then the Enquirer exposed him. He lied and they became a “Birther”.

A “Mark” BELIEVED WILLIAM “FREEZER” JEFFERSON WHEN HE SAID: “I DON’T KNOW HOW THAT CASH GOT IN MY FREEZER” Then they threw him in the slammer and they knew he lied and they became a “Birther”.

A “Mark” BELIEVED LINDA LINGEL WHEN SHE SAID: "So I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi'olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii. And that's just a fact and yet people continue to call up and e-mail and want to make it an issue and I think it's again a horrible distraction for the country by those people who continue this."
Then they learned she lied, Fukino's statement never identified Kapiolani as Obama's birthplace and they became a “Birther”.

Fukino said, "[I have]...personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record...,"

Beyond the lie, if Lingle disclosed Obama's birth hospital without his permission, she has committed a misdemeanor. If Obama gave permission for this public disclosure, then Hawaii no longer has a basis for maintaining the privacy of Obama's birth records.

Welcome to the new members of the growing army of “BIRTHERS”

Chris Mathews, Rush Limbaugh, Hawaii Governor Abercrombie Senator Will Espero and Hawaii Legislators; Rida Cabanilla, Jerry Chang, Joey Manahan, John Mizuno and Calvin Say to name a few.

Proud to be a “Birther”

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles. from supporter, Mr. Tomy Michaels Posted on | May 4, 2011 | No Comments Thank you Dr. Taitz Wednesday, May 4, 2011 4:18 PM From: This sender is DomainKeys verified “Tomy Michaels” Add sender to Contacts To: Dear Dr. Orly Taitz, I just wanted to send you a big THANK YOU for being what appears to be the last American hero by pursuing the scamming liar BHO. It appears Donald Trump actually considers himself a legitimate “politician” now and thus doesn’t want to make waves (after getting there on the B.C.). Any idiot can see that the new longform birth certificate is a fraud. It’s too bad all our politicians have no clothes. Sincerely ~ Mr. Tomy Michaels Longmont, CO Category: Uncategorized FOIA request sent by certified mail to Alvin Onaka, state registrar of HI

ph. 949-683-5411
May 4, 2011
Via certified mail
Dr. Alvin T. Onaka
 State Registrar and Chief of the Office of Health Status Monitoring of the Hawaii Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street.
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Dear Mr. Onaka,
For the last three years there were multiple requests made for release of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate.
In December of 2010 a highly Decorated U.S. military officer, bronze star recipient, Lt. Col Terry Lakin, was imprisoned, after he questioned, whether President Obama is legitimate for office in light of the fact, that he does not have a valid long form birth certificate. Lakin stated, that if he as an officer is required to show his birth certificate, so should the Commander-in-Chief. When LTC, Dr. Lakin stated that he would redeploy only after he could see a valid long form birth certificate of Obama, he was court -martialed, stripped of his military pension after 17 years of service and imprisoned. At the time, Mr. Obama ignored all requests from hundreds of citizens, refused to show his long form birth certificate and LTC Lakin was sent to rot in Fort Leavenworth prison.
Recently a multibillionaire, Donald Trump, raised this issue and quickly rose in polls as a leading presidential candidate for the 2012 election. At the same time 9th Circuit court of Appeals allowed my case Keyes, Barnett et al v Obama  to be presented at oral argument, which usually a sign that the court sees merit in the appeal.  In this case, I, as an attorney for plaintiffs, demanded release of Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate, among a number of other documents. In an apparent preemptive strike, just two working days before the court hearing, Mr. Obama released, what he claimed to be a true and correct copy of his birth certificate. (Exhibit 1)
Analysis of what Mr. Obama released to the public, shows that it cannot possibly be a true and correct copy of the 1961 typewritten birth certificate, that Mr. Obama claims to have. While there some 70 areas in this computer image, indicative of the fact, that it is not a true and correct copy of the original birth certificate, most visible are following areas and easily demonstrated by comparing Mr. Obama’s computer image with a birth certificate given to one, Susan Nordyke, born only a few hours after Mr. Obama, in the same hospital (Exhibit 2).
1. Original birth certificate was issued on white paper. Nordyke birth certificate is indeed on white paper, which is turning yellow due to aging process. Obama’s birth certificate is on green safety paper, which was not used at the time.
2. Nordyke birth certificate has defined borders. Obama’s birth certificate does not have borders.
3. Nordyke birth certificate contains an easily identifiable seal; Obama’s birth certificate does not have a seal.
4. Nordyke birth certificate contains certification, that the above is a true and correct copy of the record, while Obama birth certificate states “…record or ABSTRACT of the record”. (emphasis added). Since abstract of record can be absolutely anything, including old wives tales, literary, there is a need to inspect the original birth certificate in the health department.
Release of records typically involves balancing of the rights of the individual whose records are revealed against the rights of the public.
As Mr. Obama revealed his purported birth certificate with great fanfare and called all doubters “carnival barkers,”- he clearly will have no valid privacy claims in opposition to a request to see his original birth certificate in the Health Department in Hawaii.
On the other hand, there is a significant public interest. LTC Lakin is sitting in prison, denied a right to know, -whether we have a legitimate president.
Many others around the country have similar doubts. These doubts were enhanced by the following facts:
a. Mr. Obama’s selective service certificate (Exhibit 3) shows him using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425
b.  Social Security Verification Systems (Exhibit 4)  show that this number was never assigned to Mr. Obama.
If Mr. Obama had a valid long form birth certificate, issued to him in 1961 in the state of Hawaii, he did not need to resort to using an invalid Connecticut Social Security number.
American citizens are entitled to know, whether an individual occupying the position of the President of the United States and Commander in Chief is committing Social Security fraud and elections fraud.
As such the Public Interest greatly outweighs any privacy concerns Mr. Obama might have.
1. I respectfully request access to the original 1961 birth certificate of Mr. Obama for me and my forensic document experts.
2. I request a clarification, whether a computer image presented by Mr. Obama as a true and correct copy of his birth certificate, was actually signed by you
2. If you indeed signed this document, what was used as the original? As it does not resemble the original documents from 1961, did you use a notation in archives as an abstract and the basis for creating this “document”.
Respectfully submitted,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

No comments:

Post a Comment