Donald Trump to tap his wallet for probe of 'forged' document?

"My gut tells me a couple things," Trump explained. "Number 1, you know, it took a long time to produce this certificate, and when it came out, as you know, check the Internet, many people say it is not real, you know, that it's a forgery."

Read more: Donald Trump to tap his wallet for probe of 'forged' document? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=376973#ixzz1huJ5ki4O

Texas Secretary of State Addresses Question about Presidential Eligibility

Update: Texas Secretary of State Addresses Question about Presidential Eligibility

AND CITES THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!

by Sharon Rondeau

In 1836, Texas gained independence from Mexico, declaring itself a Republic. It sided with the Confederacy during the Civil War.

(Feb. 4, 2011) — A citizen contacted the Texas Secretary of State, Hope Andrade, whose responsibility it is to oversee the Elections Division.  According to its website, the Secretary of State “provides assistance and advice to election officials on the proper conduct of elections.”

From: Redacted

Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:54 PM
To: Elections Internet
Subject: Qualification to run for Office of The Presidency of The United States

Texas Board of Elections,

What are the qualifications to be President of The United States. It is not displayed on the Texas Board of Elections webpage.

My Request is that all Candidacy qualification remain throughout the year for educational purposes.

And the Elections Office responded:

From: Elizabeth Winn <EHanshawWinn@sos.state.tx.us>

Subject: FW: Qualification to run for Office of The Presidency of The United States – Maroney (EHW)
To: Redacted
Cc: “Kim Beal” <KBeal@sos.state.tx.us>
Date: Thursday, February 3, 2011, 3:48 PM

As you may know, the President of the United States is up for election every 4 years.  The next general election for this office will be in November 2012.  The requirements to run for President of the United States are outlined in Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.  A candidate for this office must be:

1.    A natural born Citizen of the United States ;

2.    At least 35 years old; and

3.    A resident within the United States for at least 14 years.

The Texas Legislature is currently in session, which is why there is an absence of information on our website.  Additionally, because of the federal MOVE Act (to help military and overseas voters vote), Texas has a challenge of revisiting it primary dates and filing deadlines to accommodate the 45 day deadline for mailing ballots to this group.  Therefore, we will likely see some changes in the candidate filing process before the session ends late May of 2011..

We hope that this information answers your questions. If you need additional assistance, please e-mail or contact the elections division toll-free at 1-800-252-8683 (VOTE).

Elections Division Staff

Texas Secretary of State

1-800-252-8683

Elections@sos.state.tx.us

Full contact information for Texas Elections Division personnel can be located here.  A Texas state representative, Leo Berman, introduced a bill in the legislature which would amend the state’s election code such that candidates for president and vice president would be required to submit their original birth certificates in order to have their names placed on the ballot.  If adopted, HB 295 would take effect on September 1, 2011.

Berman’s represents the 6th District which is detailed here.  In regard to Barack Hussein Obama, who has failed to reveal his original, long-form birth certificate as well as other documentation about his history, Berman stated:

This bill is necessary because we have a president whom the American people don’t know whether he was born in Kenya or some other place.” If you are running for president or vice president, you’ve got to show here in Texas that you were born in the United States and the birth certificate is your proof.

A retired Lt. Colonel in the U.S. Army, Berman won re-election in his district in 2010 by garnering 86.86% of the vote.  He is originally from New York City.

A follow-up letter was sent by the same citizen to the Texas Elections Office:

2/6/2011

To: Texas Election Division,Texas Secretary of State,

I was hoping that your response letter would answer my question for the qualification of the United States Presidency, however it did only in part.

I do understand the qualifications for the Presidency of Article 2 Section 1 when stated ” at least 35 years of age”.

I do understand the qualifications for the Presidency of Article 2 Section 1 when stated ” A resident within the United States for at least 14 years. “

But when it comes to the qualification of the President in Article 2 Section 1 when stated  ” No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President “; Your answer is still not clear and since you are in charge of the Elections in Texas you most certainly understand the qualifications to run for Office within Texas.

The Architect’s of the United States Constitution showed a distinct difference between a ” Citizen “ and a ” natural born Citizen ” that is stipulated in Article 2 Section 1.

To only be a Citizen and become President of the United States you would of had to of been ” alive at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution ” and still alive today. Since all those Citizens at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution are not alive today, now one must be a natural born Citizen.

The 14 Amendment defines ” citizen “ as born or naturalized in the United States. So what is the meaning of Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen since a Citizen and a natural born Citizen are not one and the same as you can see in Article 2?

Can a child of two Illegal Aliens that is born in Texas run for the Presidency of the United States since that child is a 14 Amendment citizen?

I might run for The Presidency of The United States of America and I need to know if I qualify. I need to know if I am an Article 2 natural born Citizen as intended by the founding fathers of this Great Country.

Sincerely,

Creg Maroney

The Post & Email will be reporting on any response which Mr. Maroney receives from the Texas Elections Office which might attempt to define the term “natural born Citizen.”

Update, February 8, 2011: The following response was received on February 7, 2011 from the Texas Elections Division:

Mr. Maroney,

The following Section 1401 of Title 8 of the United States Code defines “citizens of the United States at birth.”  Please note that our office has no authority to or expertise in interpreting United States law or the Constitution; therefore, we are providing this information simply to guide you further.  We recommend speaking to a federal official or legal counsel who is qualified to interpret provisions of the United States Constitution.

Sec. 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(a) a person born in the United States , and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian , or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United

States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such

(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States ;

(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;

(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States , or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical- presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and

(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.

Section 1401 of Title 8 of the United States Code may also be found here – http://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Mr. Maroney then sent another inquiry:

From: Creg MaroneySubject: Re: FW: FW: Qualification to run for Office of The Presidency of The United States – Maroney (EHW)
To: “Elizabeth Winn” <EHanshawWinn@sos..state.tx.us>
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 9:38 AM
To: Texas Election Division, Texas Secretary of State,

Section 1401 of Title 8 of the United States Code defines “citizens of the United States at birth.

My questions are quite simple for those in charge of elections throughout the State of Texas.

Are those citizens defined in Section 1401 of Title 8 United States Code eligible for the Ballot and will be placed on the Ballot in Texas to run for The Presidency and Vice President of The United States?

Are those citizens defined in Section 1401 of Title 8 United States Code  eligible for the candidacy on any Ballot in Texas ” except ” for The Presidential and Vice President?

Sincerely,

Creg Maroney

Are you convinced he's a US citizen?

Now that you've seen Obama's long-form birth certificate, are you convinced he's a US citizen?

 Results with 3,248 short comments

Total of 315,264 votes - click on the "Display Comments" bar below to sort comments

11.7%

Yes. It is irrefutable proof he was born in Hawaii.

36,872 votes

36.5%

No. There will always be doubt in my mind.

115,223 votes

51.8%

I never questioned his citizenship in the first place.

163,169 votes

What is a "Natural Born Citizen"

What is a "Natural Born Citizen"

By Beckwith 

People are confused because they don't understand the meaning of the relevant legal terms.  This chart that shows the elements for each of the constitutional terms that are used in the Constitution or in caselaw by the Supreme Court.

For each presidential candidate, they can put the factual history of their birth in the equation and see if they fit the bill to be president of the U.S. under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, and the relevant federal law under U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), and Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939).  As you can clearly see, Obama is a U. S. citizen, but he's not a "natural born citizen" and, as such, is not eligible for POTUS, because his father, a Kenyan, was not a U. S. citizen.

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:

" ... I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents [plural, meaning two] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen..." (http://americamustknow.com/default.aspx)

U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark's importance is that it is the first case decided by the Supreme Court that attempts to explain the meaning of "natural born citizen" under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  Natural born citizen is similiar to the meaning of what a natural born subject is under Common Law in England.  That is one of the reasons why the framers specifically included a grandfather clause (natural born Citizen OR a Citizen of the United States, at the time of adoption of this Constitution).  The founding fathers knew that in order to be president, they had to grandfather themselves in because they were British subjects.  If they didn't, they could not be President of the U.S.  The holding in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark states that Wong Kim Ark is a native born citizen.  If you look at the fact of Wong Kim Ark being born in San Francisco, CA, that holding is correct.

Perkins v. Elg's importance is that it actually gives examples of what a Citizen of the U.S. is; what a native born American Citizen is; and what a natural born citizen of the U.S. is.  A natural born citizen is a person who is born of two U.S. citizen parents AND born in the mainland of U.S.

An attorney, who practices in Missouri and the federal courts system and is also an accountant, observes that two plus two equals four (2+2 = 4).  There is no dispute in that.   Also, the similar logic applies with the meaning of what a natural born citizen of the U.S. is.  To be one as defined under U.S. Supreme Court case law and the English Common Law adopted by the U.S., you have to be born of two U.S. citizen parents AND born in the U.S. mainland.

Congress for 26 times has tried to change the meaning of natural born citizen as early as the 1790 Nationality Act and 26 times the bill has been defeated, repealed or ruled unconstitutional.  The meaning of what natural born citizen is what it is.  Regardless of what people in the mainstream media and in our federal government try to do, they still can't change the fact of the meaning of what a natural born citizen is.  What is occurring right now is straight up a coup de'tat seeking to destroy the Constitution as we know it.

Either way, three of the candidates, Obama (aka Soetoro), McCain, and Calero are not eligible under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  Just like a residential purchase of a home is void if fraud in the inducement (where one party conceals a material fact that if people knew about it ahead of time, they would not enter into a residential purchase of a home), the same thing has occurred with the primaries and presidential election on November 4, 2008.  Because these three candidates (Obama (aka Soetoro), McCain, and Calero) were ineligible under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, then the 2008 presidential election and its results are void.  Regardless of what game of charades people in the mainstream media and people within our federal government are trying to pull.  That is a legal fact that is not in dispute.

Where did the U. S. Law originate?

Emmerich de Vattel was a Swiss jurist who attained world preeminence in international law.  This was primarily the result of his great foundational work, which he published in 1758.  His monumental work -- The Law of Nations --  applied a theory of natural law to international relations.  His scholarly, foundational, and systematic explanation of the Law of Nations was especially influential in the United States.

The Law of Nations was so influential in the United States because his principles of liberty and equality coincided with the ideals expressed in the U. S. Declaration of Independence.  In particular, his definitions in terms of Law governing nations regarding citizenship, defense of neutrality, and his rules for commerce between neutral and belligerent states were considered authoritative in the United States.

Many have said that de Vattel's Law of Nations was THE primary reference and defining book used by the framers of the U. S. Constitution.  It is really not possible to overstate the influence of de Vattel's Law of Nations as the primary reference book in the drafting of the U. S. Constitution.  Emmerich de Vattel's Law of Nations is almost beyond comparison in its value as a defining document regarding U. S. Constitution intent and interpretation.  The Law of Nations, or the Principles of Natural Law, published in 1758, is the first, and ONLY, definitive work the Framers of the U. S. Constitution used for the "Natural Born Citizen" phrase they placed within the Constitution.  It nails what the Constitution means by the "natural born citizen" phrase of Section 1, Article 2, of the U. S. Constitution.

It is amazing how perfectly, precisely, and explicitly what Emmerich de Vattel, wrote in paragraph 212, of book 1, chapter 19, of The Law of Nations entitled CITIZENS AND NATIONS, applies to the Obama FRAUD.  Quite clearly and explicitly it defines why Barry Soetoro, AKA Barack Heussein Obama Junior, can NOT possibly be qualified to be the President of the United States.  Obama MUST be disqualified from the office of President of the United States according to the U. S. Constitution Section 1 Article 2.

That is simply the only thing the Rule of Law could conclude.  All U. S. military personal and every other American under oath to protect and defend the U. S. Constitution will be duty bound to remove the fraudulent usurper.  This situation is REGARDLESS of votes, electors, media blackouts, high profile embarrassments, state court decisions, supreme court actions or inaction, birth certificates real or forged, or any other documents -- Obama can NOT LEGALLY BE The US President.

Emmerich de Vattel's explanation of "Natural Born Citizen" given in his 1759 benchmark work, used, and so often quoted, by the framers of the U. S. Constitution, makes the understanding simple, explicit, clear, definite, exact, precise, and strict.  In the CITIZENS AND NATIONS, paragraph #212, de Vattel says: "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.  As the society can not exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.  The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as a matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it.  THE COUNTRY OF THE FATHERS IS THEREFORE THAT OF THE CHILDREN."

No documentation is required.  Everyone should understand and KNOW the answer to the question of what country is the country of which Obama was a natural born citizen.  It is IMPOSSIBLE for Barry Obama, Barry Soetoro, or Barack Hussein Obama Junior, to be a natural born United States citizen.  Obama can NOT POSSIBLY be a "natural born citizen" of the U. S. because his father, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, was a Citizen of UK and/or Kenya.  Barack Hussein Obama Junior could be a natural born British Citizen or a natural born Kenyan Citizen.  Whether Barack Hussein Obama Junior was born in Hawaii, Kenya, or the moon, is irrelevant.  Birth documents, real or forged, are irrelevant.  Yes, even VOTES ARE IRRELEVANT.  Even Supreme Court action, or inaction, is irrelevant.  It is simply FRAUD and illegal for Barack Hussein Obama Junior to be put in the office of U. S. President by any means or reason.

This explains Obama's strange behavior in all of his documents and records being SEALED and why he has already spent over $800,000.00 saying NO DOCUMENTS WILL BE ALLOWED UNSEALED or made public.

Barack Hussein Obama Junior is at the epicenter of the greatest national disaster in the history of the United States.  NOTHING which Obama would ever do in the office of U. S. President could ever be anything other than FRAUD and ILLEGAL.

Obama's McCain resolution demands 'American' parents

President's 'birth certificate' confirms dad Kenyan citizen

By Bob Unruh © 2011 WorldNetDaily

Perhaps it's a good thing that the U.S. Senate didn't take up a resolution on Barack Obama's status as a "natural born Citizen" in 2008 – as members did for GOP candidate Sen. John McCain while both were seeking the U.S. presidency.

The Democrat might not have qualified under the requirements the Senate, including Obama, a co-sponsor and then-senator, put in the resolution, including the demand that the candidate have "American citizen" parents.

The candidates' circumstances were not the same: Questions were raised over McCain's eligibility under the Constitution's demand that a president be a "natural born Citizen," because he was born to American citizen military parents while they are on assignment overseas.

The specific allegations have been placed online by YouTube participate PPSimmons, who previously has analyzed and provided commentary on the issues of eligibility to the presidency:

Questions over Obama's have arisen because of his almost total concealment of documentation from his life – including his passport records, kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records and schedules, medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license and adoption records.

Specifically, because of the lack of documentation, it was suspected he might not have been born in Hawaii, or might have another circumstance that would preclude his eligibility under the Constitution's "natural born Citizen" requirement, such as a loss of that status by taking Indonesia citizenship during his childhood, or relinquishing that status by using a foreign passport during his college years. Or that he didn't qualify because of a dual citizenship inherited from a foreign national father.

He only released a copy of his "Certificate of Live Birth" from Hawaii this week because, he said, those questions were distracting him from the nation's problems, such as massive spending, job instability and others.

That document is this:

Image released by the White House April 27, 2011

But plaintiffs and lawyers who earlier brought a lawsuit against Obama alleging he is ineligible to be president, say he failed to meet the "natural born Citizen" requirement because his father is a foreign national, and the understanding of "natural born Citizen" at the time the Constitution was written was a citizen offspring of citizen parents.

That's also what Obama, as a cosponsor, included in his Senate Resolution 511 in 2008 regarding McCain. The statement includes two references to "Americans" as parents or "American citizens" as parents. "Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country's President," it states. Read more: Obama's McCain resolution demands 'American' parents

 

The text of the resolution is:

2d Session

S. RES. 511

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 10, 2008

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

April 24, 2008

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

April 30, 2008

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States;

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country's President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress's own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen';

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

The statement was sponsored by Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who was joined by Sens. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.; Thomas Coburn, R-Okla.; Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.; Jim Webb, D-Va.; and Obama.

 

Leahy issued a statement at the time that praised the action, but mentioned Obama only as a cosponsor and did not address questions over his eligibility.

His statement cited The New York Times for "publishing a report calling into question the legality of McCain's presidential run based on whether he is a 'natural born Citizen,' as required by the Constitution."

"This bipartisan resolution erases any doubt that Senator McCain is eligible to run for president," said Leahy.

"The Senate was right to quickly pass this measure, and we can now put to rest any question of his eligibility."

"There's no question in my mind that Senator McCain is eligible to become president, and I'm proud that my colleagues in the Senate came together on this resolution to help quickly put this debate to rest," McCaskill stated at the time.

Leahy's statement was specific on the issue of U.S. parents.

"Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen. I recently asked Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, a former federal judge, if he had any doubts in his mind. He did not," he said then.

The video cited Vattel's The Law of Nations, writings from which the U.S. Founders drew both ideas and definitions. There, "natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens," according to Book 1, Chapter 19, Paragraph 212.

Read more: Obama's McCain resolution demands 'American' parents http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292901#ixzz1L2dOcZpv

Washington Times report - Newly released Obama birth certificate forensic forgery ExopoliticsTV

REALIST NEWS - Obama birth certificate vs 1963

Shows proof beyond all doubt

100% PROOF! Obama "RESOLVES" That He Is Not Eligible To Be President! (Condemning Info!)

VERIFY VATTEL AND FOUNDING FATHERS
http://www.birthers.org/USC/Vattel.html

Vattel's Influence on the term a Natural Born Citizen What is a natural born citizen? Where did the framers come up with this term? Where was it used before? So many questions, and the answers are right there if anyone wishes to search out the truth. The term Natural born Citizen appears in our Constitution, in Article 1, Section 2, with these words, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States." Before the Constitution the closest reference we have to Natural Born Citizen is from the legal treatise "the Law of Nations," written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19, § 212. Of the citizens and natives. "The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country." "Please note that the correct title of Vattel's Book I, Chapter 19, section 212, is "Of the citizens and naturals". It is not "Of citizens and natives" as it was originally translated into English.

Proof That Obama's Newly Released Birth Certificate Is A Photoshop Fake!

Idiot's Guide to the White House Birth Certificate forgery

Obama Birth Certificate Released! But Don't Forget THESE Things! Strange, Isn't it

Obama released what he claims is the "long form" Birth Certificate.

Look carefully at the bottom. What you are seeing is a certified copy made just a few days ago. There is a date stamp from April 25th 2011 on it. See that phrase, "I certify this is a true copy OR ABSTRACT OF THE RECORD ON FILE?" An abstract means that the current registrar just made a hand copy of the exact same information seen in the computer-generated record Obama already released, then certified it as an exact same copy of the computer-generated record Obama already released. There is nothing new here. There is nothing to suggest that this document was was actually created in 1961.

Kenya (listed as Obama's father's nation of birth) wasn't called Kenya in 1961. It was the British East Africa Protectorate. It was not known as " Kenya " until 1963.

In 1961, the hospital Obama was born in was NOT named the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital , as shown on the above certificate. In 1961, the hospital Obama was born in was named the Kauaikeolani Chil dr en's Hospital. It did not change its name to the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until it merged with the Kapiolani hospital system in 1978.

But don't worry, the American sheepish are too dumber down to understand this or to even care.   As long as American Idol and Dancing With The Stars are still on TV, all is well.  The lies on top of lies will continue.

President Obama’s birth certificate delivers news to doctor’s family

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/global/video/videoplayer.js?rnd=737100 

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/global/video/videoplayer.js?rnd=458604

HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) - The debate over the president's birthplace began two and a half years ago.  While the Hawaii Department of Health had the certificate all along they had to wait for the president's request to release it.

In a letter from the White House dated on Good Friday President Barack Obama officially asked the Director of Health in Hawaii for two certified copies of his "original certificate of live birth."  The letter was signed Barack Obama.

On Monday April 25, Loretta Fuddy, Health Director, responded to the President saying she personally witnessed the copying of the certificate and attests to the authenticity.

That day President Obama's personal lawyer Judith Corley flew to Hawaii and picked up the birth certificate copies.  She paid ten dollars for the first copy and four dollars for the second. The fees were paid in cash.  Corley then flew back to Washington DC to deliver the copies. 

Wednesday the President released the certificate of live birth for the world to see and then went on Oprah to talk about it.

"When it first came up were you thinking, I hope I was born here?" asked Oprah.

"Can I just say? I was there, so I knew (laughter). I knew I had been born. I remembered it," laughed President Obama in his response.

That episode of Oprah will air in its entirety Monday May 2.

The long form original certificate of live birth reveals several new details about Barack Obama's first days in Hawaii. It lists his mom's address at the time of birth at 6085 Kalanianaole Highway, now the site of a gated home in Hawaii Kai.  It also says his mom, Stanley Ann Dunham was 18 at the time. His dad, Barack Hussein Obama was 25 and lists his birth place as Kenya, East Africa.  It does not make any mention of religious affiliation of either parent.

"We're not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by side shows and carnival barkers," said President Obama, during a press conference.

In an attempt to put the birther conspiracy to bed Ivalee Sinclair woke up as Hawaii's newest celebrity as her husband's signature is on the most famous birth certificate around.

"At 6:00 this morning my daughter in law Dawn Sinclair called and said mom you've got to go on TV, President Obama released his live birth certificate and dad delivered him.  It was great news. A big big surprise for all of us," said Ivalee Sinclair, Dr. David A Sinclair's wife.

The Sinclair family has made quite an impact in Hawaii. Ivalee Sinclair came to Hawaii on the very first civilian ship to the islands.  She is a Jefferson Award winner for her work advocating for special needs children and co-authored the Felix Consent Decree.  Dr. David Sinclair's dad built Hawaii's first airport.  Now delivering a president can be added to the Sinclair family's list of accomplishments.

David A Sinclair was a fighter pilot in World War II.  After the war he returned to Hawaii. He fell in love and married Ivalee in 1947.

"I know he was beloved by many people," said Sinclair.

He was an Obgyn in Hawaii from 1960 to 1988 and delivered thousands of babies in that time but he and his family had no idea one of them would go on to be president.

"Rather awesome," laughed Sinclair. "Amazing, I knew he was a good physician and I knew he took good care of his people, but I had no idea he delivered someone of such fame."

She says President Obama's mom was likely Dr. Sinclair's patient because he worked in a solo practice and did not respond to deliveries for anyone but his own patients.

Dr. Sinclair passed away in 2003 but Mrs. Sinclair has no doubt it's her husband signature and says there is no way it's faked or forged.

"That is his signature and I have many pieces of paper with his signature on it and I'd be happy to show them to anyone who questions it but that is his signature," said Sinclair.

Even still she's guessing this won't be the end of the issue.

"I think if you choose to believe it's not true, you will always find a way not to believe it. I hope that people that are reasonable and rationale and believe in facts will put the rumors to rest and we move on," said Sinclair.

Today Governor Neil Abercrombie said, "No rational person can question the president's citizenship."  He also says, "It is an insult to the President, his parents and the office to suggest he was not born in Hawaii."

Click here to view the full birth certificate.
Letters from President Obama and Ms. Corley.
Letter from Director Fuddy.

Barack Obama on Oprah Winfrey (April 2011)

Barack Hussein Obama's birth certificate

President Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate

View more documents from White House

OR http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

My Real Birth Certificate Hawaii in the 1960's

I was born in Honolulu in the 60's I have a copy of My Real Birth Certificate that was requested by the Army in 1985 from Hawaii so I could join the Army. I know what a Real Birth Certificate looks like from Hawaii in the 1960's and what BO has provided is not it. You can call Me a birther or whatever You want but that BS that was posted today was not a Real Birth Certificate from Hawaii. I know because I have one. SouthernTrendKill Revolution Is My Name Smoked Another SBC

http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/showthread.php?p=6137899

Now look at BHO http://whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Birth Certificate a PhotoShop Fraud?

Shenanigans! Obama's new Birth Certificate can be easily pulled to pieces by a child... InfoWars' Rob Dew explains and shows how to expose the layers within the original PDF file of Obama's long form birth certificate.

The copy the White House Released is Not a Copy. It is Computer Manufactured.

Obamas WHITE HOUSE Birth Certificate - Real... or Another Fake?