Donald Trump to tap his wallet for probe of 'forged' document?

"My gut tells me a couple things," Trump explained. "Number 1, you know, it took a long time to produce this certificate, and when it came out, as you know, check the Internet, many people say it is not real, you know, that it's a forgery."

Read more: Donald Trump to tap his wallet for probe of 'forged' document? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=376973#ixzz1huJ5ki4O

Arpaio gets death threats over Obama investigation

Warned he 'will be filled with thousand bullet holes'

Read more: Arpaio gets death threats over Obama investigation http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=375329#ixzz1huG2Kbod

New Hampshire Obama Ballot Eligibility Challenge Rulings

 

Presidential Eligibility Law

NH RSA 655-  655:17-b Declaration of Intent; Presidential  Candidates Who File Nomination Papers.

 I. Declarations of intent for each candidate for president who seeks nomination by nomination papers shall be in the form provided in paragraph II. Declarations of intent required by this section shall be filed with the secretary of state, signed by the candidate, and notarized by a notary public.

II.  I, _________, swear under penalties of perjury that I am qualified to be a candidate for president of the United States pursuant to article II, section 1, clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”  I further declare that I am domiciled in the city (or town or unincorporated place) of _____, county of ____, state of ____, and am a qualified voter therein; that I intend to be a candidate for the office of president to be chosen at the general election to be held on the ____ day of ____; and I intend to file nomination papers by the deadline established under RSA 655:43.  I further declare that, if qualified as a candidate for said office, I shall not withdraw; and that, if elected, I shall be qualified for and shall assume the duties of said office.

U.S. Constitution- Article II Section 1 Clause 5

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Perjury- Lying About Previous Candidate Disqualifications For Eligibility, for Presidential and Assembly Candidates

Plaintiffs were told that the Commission doesn’t do things such as THIS (disqualification of Presidential candidates Sal Mohamed and Abdul K. Hassan.  In 2006, this same BLC struck the names of eight (8) candidates for state representative from the ballot for ineligibility for that office: Fran Defeo, Robert Ordonez, Maureen Baxley, James W. Danforth, Matthew B. Preston, Greta M. Cocco, Ron Peddle, and Matthew Covey.

N.H. Asst. Attorney General Boffetti told the five Ballot Law Commissioners deciding the N.H. State Representatives’ complaint that they could only consider whether Mr. Obama had properly filed his declaration of candidacy form according to N.H. law and paid the $1,000 filing fee. In other words, they were not allowed to rule on Mr. Obama’s purported Constitutional ineligibility for office.

The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission and their consulting attorney claimed that “the law” refers only to the Ballot Law Commission Revised Statutes Title LXIII Chapter 665.47 and 665.48, and that they only have jurisdiction to rule on whether the candidate application is filled out appropriately and the check for filing is valid. This is patently false, belied by the fact that the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission rejected eight candidates from the ballot in 2006. But in this case, five years later, the BLC denied having jurisdiction.

REGARDING BALLOT LAW COMMISSION’S JURISDICTION

665:7 Filing Disputes

“The ballot law commission shall hear and determine disputes arising over whether nomination papers or declarations of candidacy filed with the secretary of state conform with the law.”

The law is, that to be eligible for the Presidency, you MUST be a natural born citizen and Obama is NOT a natural born citizen.

“Obama” is NOT even an America citizen, according to the Constitutional Framers. You will see that all my quoted sources are from the Library of Congress, so to CHANGE the framer’s intent, there would have had to have been amendments to the Constitution, changing the Presidential requirements and that has never happened!

The commission says that they do not deal with criminal matters and do not have the authority to remove “Obama” for not being Natural Born, but that is FALSE because in 2008, the commission removed Sal Mohamed, who was removed from the ballot because he was not a Natural Born Citizen, being born in Egypt.

SO THEY DO HAVE THE AUTHORITY!

REGARDING JAMESON FRENCH AND POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Section 665:3 Political Contributions Prohibited.

“No ballot law commission member shall make a contribution, as defined in RSA 664:2, to any candidate for office or political committee.”

http://www.fec.gov/finance/disclosure/norindsea.shtml

(Type in French Jameson and search the page for 2010, then search page for 2011 for all donations)

REGARDING ALTERNATE MEMBERS FILLING IN

Section 665:2 Alternate Member

There shall be 5 members present in person at all meetings. In case any member of the commission is absent from any meeting or unable to perform his or her duties or disqualifies himself or herself as commissioner, an alternate member who shall have the same qualifications as those of the commissioner whose place he or she is temporarily filling shall perform the duties of the commissioner.

REGARDING JANE CLEMONS’ APPOINTMENT

Section 665:1

“No person shall be appointed to the commission who holds an elected office or who is an election official.”

The day that Jane was appointed to the Ballot Law Commission she WAS STILL a House Representative, so technically, she was not eligible for the position at that time. She did resign, the day before her effective date to the commission, but she was appointed while holding an elected office and the law clearly states no one should be “appointed”, it doesn’t say no one should be “elected” or “approved”, it says appointed and technically, she was still a House Representative. The appointment date is different (earlier) than the approved/effective date and her effective date is September 14, 2010, so even giving her the benefit of doubt by saying she was approved in one days turn around time (which is highly unlikely) it would have been impossible for her to be appointed, without still being a House Member. She’s even still got a House website:

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=374959 

There were probably Federal election laws broken as well, since people were effectively disenfranchised, documents were forged, etc.   Campaign contributions were therefore later  fraudulently solicited/collected, millions of people were harmed by actions of a usurper in the White House, lacking allegiance to the USA, etc. We’ll get to that later

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Only a natural born citizen can legally be President of the USA.  ”Obama” is not one.

Texas Secretary of State Addresses Question about Presidential Eligibility

Update: Texas Secretary of State Addresses Question about Presidential Eligibility

AND CITES THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!

by Sharon Rondeau

In 1836, Texas gained independence from Mexico, declaring itself a Republic. It sided with the Confederacy during the Civil War.

(Feb. 4, 2011) — A citizen contacted the Texas Secretary of State, Hope Andrade, whose responsibility it is to oversee the Elections Division.  According to its website, the Secretary of State “provides assistance and advice to election officials on the proper conduct of elections.”

From: Redacted

Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:54 PM
To: Elections Internet
Subject: Qualification to run for Office of The Presidency of The United States

Texas Board of Elections,

What are the qualifications to be President of The United States. It is not displayed on the Texas Board of Elections webpage.

My Request is that all Candidacy qualification remain throughout the year for educational purposes.

And the Elections Office responded:

From: Elizabeth Winn <EHanshawWinn@sos.state.tx.us>

Subject: FW: Qualification to run for Office of The Presidency of The United States – Maroney (EHW)
To: Redacted
Cc: “Kim Beal” <KBeal@sos.state.tx.us>
Date: Thursday, February 3, 2011, 3:48 PM

As you may know, the President of the United States is up for election every 4 years.  The next general election for this office will be in November 2012.  The requirements to run for President of the United States are outlined in Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.  A candidate for this office must be:

1.    A natural born Citizen of the United States ;

2.    At least 35 years old; and

3.    A resident within the United States for at least 14 years.

The Texas Legislature is currently in session, which is why there is an absence of information on our website.  Additionally, because of the federal MOVE Act (to help military and overseas voters vote), Texas has a challenge of revisiting it primary dates and filing deadlines to accommodate the 45 day deadline for mailing ballots to this group.  Therefore, we will likely see some changes in the candidate filing process before the session ends late May of 2011..

We hope that this information answers your questions. If you need additional assistance, please e-mail or contact the elections division toll-free at 1-800-252-8683 (VOTE).

Elections Division Staff

Texas Secretary of State

1-800-252-8683

Elections@sos.state.tx.us

Full contact information for Texas Elections Division personnel can be located here.  A Texas state representative, Leo Berman, introduced a bill in the legislature which would amend the state’s election code such that candidates for president and vice president would be required to submit their original birth certificates in order to have their names placed on the ballot.  If adopted, HB 295 would take effect on September 1, 2011.

Berman’s represents the 6th District which is detailed here.  In regard to Barack Hussein Obama, who has failed to reveal his original, long-form birth certificate as well as other documentation about his history, Berman stated:

This bill is necessary because we have a president whom the American people don’t know whether he was born in Kenya or some other place.” If you are running for president or vice president, you’ve got to show here in Texas that you were born in the United States and the birth certificate is your proof.

A retired Lt. Colonel in the U.S. Army, Berman won re-election in his district in 2010 by garnering 86.86% of the vote.  He is originally from New York City.

A follow-up letter was sent by the same citizen to the Texas Elections Office:

2/6/2011

To: Texas Election Division,Texas Secretary of State,

I was hoping that your response letter would answer my question for the qualification of the United States Presidency, however it did only in part.

I do understand the qualifications for the Presidency of Article 2 Section 1 when stated ” at least 35 years of age”.

I do understand the qualifications for the Presidency of Article 2 Section 1 when stated ” A resident within the United States for at least 14 years. “

But when it comes to the qualification of the President in Article 2 Section 1 when stated  ” No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President “; Your answer is still not clear and since you are in charge of the Elections in Texas you most certainly understand the qualifications to run for Office within Texas.

The Architect’s of the United States Constitution showed a distinct difference between a ” Citizen “ and a ” natural born Citizen ” that is stipulated in Article 2 Section 1.

To only be a Citizen and become President of the United States you would of had to of been ” alive at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution ” and still alive today. Since all those Citizens at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution are not alive today, now one must be a natural born Citizen.

The 14 Amendment defines ” citizen “ as born or naturalized in the United States. So what is the meaning of Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen since a Citizen and a natural born Citizen are not one and the same as you can see in Article 2?

Can a child of two Illegal Aliens that is born in Texas run for the Presidency of the United States since that child is a 14 Amendment citizen?

I might run for The Presidency of The United States of America and I need to know if I qualify. I need to know if I am an Article 2 natural born Citizen as intended by the founding fathers of this Great Country.

Sincerely,

Creg Maroney

The Post & Email will be reporting on any response which Mr. Maroney receives from the Texas Elections Office which might attempt to define the term “natural born Citizen.”

Update, February 8, 2011: The following response was received on February 7, 2011 from the Texas Elections Division:

Mr. Maroney,

The following Section 1401 of Title 8 of the United States Code defines “citizens of the United States at birth.”  Please note that our office has no authority to or expertise in interpreting United States law or the Constitution; therefore, we are providing this information simply to guide you further.  We recommend speaking to a federal official or legal counsel who is qualified to interpret provisions of the United States Constitution.

Sec. 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(a) a person born in the United States , and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian , or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United

States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such

(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States ;

(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;

(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States , or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical- presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and

(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.

Section 1401 of Title 8 of the United States Code may also be found here – http://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml

Mr. Maroney then sent another inquiry:

From: Creg MaroneySubject: Re: FW: FW: Qualification to run for Office of The Presidency of The United States – Maroney (EHW)
To: “Elizabeth Winn” <EHanshawWinn@sos..state.tx.us>
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 9:38 AM
To: Texas Election Division, Texas Secretary of State,

Section 1401 of Title 8 of the United States Code defines “citizens of the United States at birth.

My questions are quite simple for those in charge of elections throughout the State of Texas.

Are those citizens defined in Section 1401 of Title 8 United States Code eligible for the Ballot and will be placed on the Ballot in Texas to run for The Presidency and Vice President of The United States?

Are those citizens defined in Section 1401 of Title 8 United States Code  eligible for the candidacy on any Ballot in Texas ” except ” for The Presidential and Vice President?

Sincerely,

Creg Maroney

Abracadabra! ‘Obama’s alias’ vanishing quickly from Web

Who in the hell is protecting the head of the ObamaNostra crime family? 

Fraud-in-Chief

 

Analyst confirms ‘Harrison J. Bounel’ identity getting scrubbed from databases

WASHINGTON – “Harrison J. Bounel,” an alias identified for Barack Obama by debt-collection and skip-trace expert Albert Hendershot, is currently being scrubbed from professional databases, the investigator reports.

“I believe Obama supporters are trying to eliminate any and all evidence of Obama’s shady past from all public databases,” Hendershot told WND. “It’s the only explanation for why the alias ‘Harrison J. Bounel’ has dropped from sight in database searches on public records done for Obama’s Social Security number and home address in Chicago.”

Hendershot documented his analysis in a report written for WND that can be read in its entirety here.

As seen in Exhibit 1, Hendershot has put together a chart that documents how he first found the Harrison J. Bounel name appearing in databases he was using to search properties in Chicago, and how he has worked with WND to make a series of previously unknown disclosures about the Obama home in Chicago’s upscale Kenwood neighborhood at 5046 S. Greenwood Avenue.

Half of Americans would like to see Congress investigate Barack Obama’s eligibility for the presidency and nearly that many believe the definition of the constitutional term “natural born citizen” means both parents must be U.S. citizens, according to a new scientific poll.

“There’s no marginalizing those who want this matter investigated by Congress,” said Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies, who conducted the WND/Wenzel Poll telephone survey June 16-19. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.85 points.

“Even among Democrats, more than one in four – 28 percent – said they now want an inquiry, as do 43 percent of independents and 77 percent of Republicans. Interestingly, men are much more skeptical than are women about the question of eligibility – only 42 percent of men said they think Obama proved his eligibility by releasing the electronic birth certificate, compared to 59 percent of women.”
The poll indicated 43.5 percent of Americans believe that a Hawaii birth would make no difference in Obama’s eligibility, as the Constitution requires both parents of a U.S. president to have been U.S. citizens – and Obama’s father was not a citizen.

The figure included 56.9 percent of the GOP, 40.2 percent of independents and 32.9 percent of Democrats.

Of course it is being removed after all the Obama does not want anything of his past revealed. we all know he is a liar, thief, conman, and one of the most dangerous man in world (the other is Soros). he needs to be removed and incarcerated, Michelle needs to be placed in prison too for the theft of millions of taxpayers money. 

When is this country going to find out exactly who this usurper really is. How can anyone that couldn't pass a security investigation for a minimal clearance be elected without any actual proof as to who this person really is? If he were a Republican we would know what his mother ate for a week before he was born. We would know who he went to school with and who his friends were. He couldn't even get into the military with the holes he has in his past and the people he associated with. After the next election the people should demand an investigation of him and his inner circle and jail those that aided, promoted, and sanctioned this miserable excuse for a human much less an American President. I never thought we would see the day a President would take pride in admitting Fraudulent acts, promote communism, and destroy every opportunity for job creation as we have today. Anybody that gets thru high school economics knows more about how to fix the economy than this puny, puffer we call a leader.
Obama is Satan's choice as the predecessor into the final days before the Tribulation. If he is re-elected the wind beneath the sails of so many Americans will no longer be. 

I am surprised that the people are happy just waiting for another election rather than impeaching him. 

I am truly amazed that we do not have the back-down to do this.

I am truly amazed that the people value their right to vote so little that they vote for the person with the best smile, the best lies, etc.

It is absolutely amazing.

I am amazed that people value the right to vote so little that they don't even bother to find out anything about people they are voting for.

That they vote for the party they have always voted for even though it is apparent that the party has changed course.
Pray for our country, visit with your neighbors, get involved even if it only means forwarding accurate and not hateful e-mails with information that should be passed on. Just do 10 forwards and they do 10 and the nation will become more informed.
Just be honest and sincere. 

Republicans just sit on their hands. No one is curious about any of this. What the heck are they afraid of? Confronting the truth about Obama? What is the truth? Who is he and how did a kid who grew up relatively poor in Indonesia get so rich??? 


He is not being impeached for one reason. Even the Republicans have proposed bills to change the requirements to be the President of the United States. No one in Congress wants him impeached because by letting him finish his term he will set a precedent that will allow non American born persons to become president. 

The bigger problem there is why hasn't the Military, CIA, NSA, FBI, on and on done their job?

None of them seem to know what their job should be in a case like this, it's appalling. 

The Mystery of Barack Obama

The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues

 

By Steve Baldwin, Exclusive to Western Center for Journalism

Most Americans don’t realize we have elected a president whom we know very little about.

Pictured: Barack Obama’s Autobiography, Dreams from My Father.

Researchers have discovered that Obama’s autobiographical books are little more than PR stunts, as they have little to do with the actual events of his life. The fact is we know less about President Obama than perhaps any other president in American history and much of this is due to actual efforts to hide his record. This should concern all Americans.

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to. The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure” will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records. He will not release his Harvard records, his Columbia College records, or his Occidental College records—he will not even release his Columbia College thesis. All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well. In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

Pictured: “Scott & Barry, 3rd grade 1969” Punahou School in Hawaii.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing – would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.

Furthermore, now that at least three document authentication experts have declared the scanned “Certificate of Live Birth” Obama’s campaign team gave to a pro-Obama website to be an obvious phony; we know that he is hiding something here as well.

Over 49 separate law suits have been filed on the eligibility/birth certificate issue alone, with several of the suits making it all the way the United States Supreme Court, only to be denied a full hearing.

Pictured: Saudi Prince Al-Walid bin Talah

What’s more, there are questions about how he paid for his Harvard Law School education since, despite a claim by Michele Obama, no one has produced any evidence that he received student loans. The Obamas will not release any student loan details despite repeated requests from the Chicago Tribune. However, it appears that his Harvard education may have been paid for by a foreign source. Khalid Al-Mansour, an advisor to Saudi prince Al-Walid bin Talah, told Manhattan Borough president, Percy Sutton, that he was raising money for Obama’s Harvard tuition. Incidentally, Prince Tala is the largest donor to CAIR, a Muslim group declared by the U.S. Government in 2007 as an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorist financing trial. At least three of CAIR’s leaders have been indicted for terrorist activities. Al-Mansour’s admission opens up speculation as to whether Muslim interests have assisted Obama’s career in the hope he would eventually be in a position someday to promote their interests.

More recently, it was discovered that Obama’s Selective Service card may have been doctored. Federal law requires all American males to register for the Selective Service (the draft) in case a major war broke out.  Blogger Debbie Schlussel has discovered solid evidence that Obama’s Selective Service registration form was submitted not when he was younger as required, but rather in 2008 and then altered to look older. Indeed, the forgers forgot to alter the “Document Location Number” which shows that it is clearly a 2008 form. This is fraud and it’s a felony and Schlussel allegations are backed up by Stephen Coffman, a former high-ranking Federal agent. Moreover, the document shows a September 4th, 1980 date and the location of the transaction as Hawaii, but at that time Obama was thousands of miles away attending Occidental College in Los Angeles.

The real reason why Obama probably did not submit this form as a teenager is that he assumed his Kenyan or Indonesian citizenship exempted him from this requirement. But clearly, as he grew older and entered politics, he saw that any documents revealing a foreign birth – Selective Service registration, birth certificate, school applications, etc – would be problematic if he ran for the presidency. Thus, it is not a coincidence that every document which contains information about his birth or citizenship is either missing, sealed, or has been altered.

Indeed, everywhere one looks into Obama’s background, we find sealed records, scrubbed websites, altered documents, deception and unanswered questions. Can anyone imagine for a second if John McCain or George Bush had blocked access to his school, medical, and birth records?  It would have been headlines but as with everything else concerning Obama, the media has given him a pass on this.

Of all these marvels, the latest mystery and probably most perplexing is that of Obama’s social security number. It appears that Obama has multiple identities in term of possessing numerous social security numbers. Orly Taitz, an attorney who has filed numerous suits against Obama regarding his eligibility to serve as president, appears to be the first to discover this. In her suit, representing a number of military officers who are refusing to serve under an ineligible commander in chief, she hired private investigator Neil Sankey to conduct research on Obama’s prior addresses and Social Society numbers. Using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, Sankey found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Obama’s name.

However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as:  “Barak Obama,” “Batock Obama,” “Barok Obama,” and “Barrack Obama.” There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name. In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name. Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided. Needless to say, there are also a slew of address and social security numbers connected to addresses in states that Obama has no known connection to.

In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042 and one starting 364.

In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999.

There are no addresses listed in New York where he attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485.

Pictured: 713 Hart Senate Office Building.

In Massachusetts – where Obama attended Harvard Law School – we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one. Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as: 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office.  This Social Security number began with 282 and was verified by the government in 2008.

This mystery grows even stranger as other addresses and Social Security numbers for Barack Obama appear in a dozen other states not known to be connected to him. Again, I am excluding those records names not spelled exactly like his name.

Tennessee, one address with a Social Security number beginning with 427

Colorado, one address, with a Social Security number beginning with 456.

Utah, two addresses, with two Social Security numbers beginning with 901 and 799.

Missouri has one address and one Social Security number beginning with 999.

Florida has two addresses listed for his him, three if you count one listed as “Barry Obama.” One is connected to a Social Security number beginning with 762.

In Georgia there are three addresses listed for him, all with different Social Security numbers:   579, 420, and 423.

In Texas there are four different addresses listed for him, one is connected to Social Security number 675.

There are two addresses listed for Barack Obama in Oregon and one address listed for him in

the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled “Barack Obama.” In some cases, the middle initial “H” is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as: “Barac,” “Barak,” and “Barrack” Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.

Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.

Pictured: Ann, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham

Nevertheless, all this mystery surrounding Obama appears to be a generational thing.  Researchers have discovered nearly a dozen aliases, at least two different Social Security numbers, and upwards of over 99 separate addresses for Ann Dunham, his mother. We do know she worked for the ultra liberal Ford Foundation but we also know she may have earned some income from pornographic poses, as evidenced by photos recently discovered by some researchers—how embarrassing. The only thing researchers are able to find out about Obama’s mother is the fact she made porn. I’m sure that’s a first for presidential mothers.

But we also know that Obama’s mother and grandparents associated with Communist Party  leaders such as Frank Marshall Davis, a man who, according to Obama’s book, Dreams from my Father, was his main mentor during much of his Hawaiian boyhood (although Obama tried to disguise his identity in his book). During the Cold War, Davis was named by congressional investigators as a key member of a secretive pro-Soviet networked that existed in Hawaii at that time.

Pictured: Communist Party leader, Frank Marshall Davis.

The lack of documents regarding Obama also extends to his mother and to his grandparents. Indeed, researchers have been unable to find marriage licenses for his mother’s two marriages, assuming she was ever legally married. Ditto goes for the marriage license for Ann’s parents. They cannot find birth certificates for her, her parents, or for even for her grandparents. Even more so, despite Obama’s boast of his grandfather’s military service, there’s no record of that either. For reasons no one knows, much of Obama’s life, his mother’s life and his grandparent’s life has been erased from the records as if they never existed.

But why would someone obtain so many Social Security numbers? According to investigators, those who create additional Social Society numbers are typically engaged in criminal activities such as Social Security fraud, tax fraud, real estate fraud, campaign contributions fraud, voter fraud and so on. While the private investigator who compiled this list says multiple social security numbers does not automatically prove there’s criminal activity involved, he states that “having said that, I have personally experienced many, many cases where such information has led to subsequent exposure of fraud, deception, money laundering and other crimes.“What is interesting to note is that Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people.

Pictured: Barrack Obama and his Grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. “Madeline Dunham was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people.”

It is clear that more research needs to be done on this issue.  The Western Center for Journalism

( http://www.westernjournalism.com) is inviting our readers to join the search for the truth. If you have any information about any of the addresses listed, we would love to hear from you. To find a complete list of all the addresses and Social Security numbers listed in the public record for Obama and family, please go to the Western Center for Journalism.

Obama’s ineligibility: When government declares war on the people

At Lexington and Concord, the American militia was able to stand their ground against oppression because they stockpiled weapons and ammunition, created an effective local intelligence network and had the support of the populace. Those are the fundamentals of a classical insurgency. In 1964, no one framed the choice better than Ronald Reagan:

“Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.”

But that was another era. Sadly for our country, Reagan greatly underestimated the corruption, the inexhaustible greed and the endless lust for power of future politicians.
We have an occupant of the White House, who is ineligible to be President, who has likely forged or been complicit in the forgery of official documents and who may be using a stolen Social Security Number.
There is ever increasing evidence of widespread press self-censorship and the altering of online documents to misinform and manipulate the American people in order to protect Barack Obama.
We have a rogue and dangerous Executive Branch and members of Congress who have violated their oaths of office and abdicated their responsibility to support and defend the Constitution and uphold the rule of law.
They are now all co-conspirators attempting to achieve absolute power and corrupt the government absolutely, all of which will eventually lead to the destruction of our republic.
Michael Barone calls it “Gangster Government”, where, in the Chrysler bailout, the Obama administration forced bondholders to accept 33 cents on the dollar on secured debts while giving United Auto Worker (UAW) retirees 50 cents on the dollar on unsecured debts.
That was a clear violation of the ordinary bankruptcy rule that secured creditors are fully paid off before unsecured creditors get anything. The politically connected UAW got preference over politically unconnected bondholders.
Add to that travesty, the destruction of 789 small business, dealer franchises during the Chrysler bankruptcy hearing.
Was that yet another violation of bankruptcy law to benefit the UAW? Why does it seem that Obama and his allies always side with the fat cats over small businesses and ordinary investors?
In his superb exposé “Chrysler Bankruptcy Exposes Dirty Politics”, Declan McCullagh documents the immorality, the breakdown of the rule of law and strong-arm tactics used by some politicians.
He describes how Obama, his allies and Congressional Democrats interfered on behalf of unions (the junior creditors) and publicly upbraided the senior creditors who were asserting their contractual rights.
The UAW has donated $25.4 million to federal politicians over the last two decades, with 99 percent of that cash going to Democrats. Obama’s final 2008 campaign stop on Election Day was a UAW phone bank.
Clifford Asness, managing partner at a $20 billion hedge fund named AQR Capital Management, called it “toxic demagoguery” and says “the president’s attempted diktat takes money from bondholders and gives it to a labor union that delivers money and votes for him.”
The Constitution is being violated and the rule of law eroded to benefit a rich and powerful elite who care not for their country, but only for themselves.
Our elected representatives, our courts and our law enforcement agencies are ignoring our requests for the redress of grievances and investigations of likely law violations.
America no longer has a government beholden to the people.
The Declaration of Independence stated:

“In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury.”

“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”
It is the dishonest and ruthless people now controlling the reins of power, who are forcing the American people toward a second Lexington and Concord.
It is those politicians and their collaborators, who force us to stand our ground, not against our Constitution, but against their perversion of it and their suppression of our liberty.
In the last paragraph of his 1964 speech, Ronald Reagan also framed our current challenge:
“You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children’s children say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done.”

Lawrence Sellin

Lawrence Sellin Most recent columns

© Canada Free Press 2011
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a recently retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve. He is a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. receives hate mail at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com

Rep. Tom McClintock: Another Ineligibility Denier

IS “TOM” GUILTY OF MISPRISION OF FELONY?

July 16, 2011

Rep. Tom McClintock was elected in 2008 and represents California's Fourth Congressional District

Dear Editor:

Recently I sent an article from Canada Free Press to my congressman, Tom McClintock, and received the following response:

Dear Redacted:

Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding President Barack Obama’s citizenship and his eligibility to serve as president.

The Constitution is the starting point for determining eligibility to serve as President. The Constitution requires that to be eligible to serve as President an individual must be a natural born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a permanent resident in the United States for at least 14 years.

Currently, a candidate’s eligibility under these requirements is vetted by a number of sources, both inside the government and out.  First, candidates go through an intensive political vetting process in both the primary and general election – their histories are carefully examined by their political opponents who have a vested interest in uncovering the facts.  At the end of the campaigns, the voting public weighs in.  Then, when all the votes have been cast and counted, it is up to Congress to certify the results.  A final check-and-balance against eligibility irregularities lies with the courts, and ultimately the Supreme Court.

President Obama has passed each of these requirements.  Further, in President Obama’s case – in addition to his Hawaii birth certificate – there were two birth announcements in major Hawaii newspapers, the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin.

Thanks again for contacting me, and I look forward to hearing from you again in the future.  Should you have any further questions regarding this or any other issue, please don’t hesitate to contact me via email or my Washington D.C. office at (202) 225-2511 or my district office in Granite Bay at (916) 786-5560.

Sincerely,

Tom

Californians to McClintock: What About the Two Citizen Parents McCain Had to Have?

6Share

0digg

WHEN WAS THE “VETTING” OF OBAMA DONE, AND BY WHOM?

by Sharon Rondeau

To which vetting process is Rep. Tom McClintock referring when he says that Obama's eligbility was determined before the election?

(Jul. 16, 2011) — In response to the letter received by Congressman Tom McClintock and published here, the congressman has received the following two letters:

Hi Tom:

As my former Congressman, I hold you in high esteem and also voted for you for Governor. I am a well-regarded retired businessman.

After reading the letter appearing below this one, purportedly from you, I offer the following thoughts. I’m writing to ask you to reconsider your position on the eligibility issue– please hear me out.

1. There was no vetting process. That has been confirmed at the federal level and for various states, including our own (please research the case against Debra Bowen, Secretary of State). Nancy Pelosi omitted the Constitutional eligibility statement in her 2008 “Obama” candidate certification in 49 states and apparently perjured herself in the 50th (Hawaii). The “media” glossed over the vetting of “Obama” and seemed strangely incurious, relying mostly upon the two somewhat fictional “autobiographies.” “Obama” offered almost no background and substantiation of his past. In fact, he has actively and aggressively covered it up, in an unprecedented manner. If you can point out how and who he was vetted by, we would like to help enlighten the benighted public, who question “Obama’s” legitimacy.

2. It is fairly clear, from the papers of the founding fathers and De Vattel’s Law of Nations, a primary reference used by them in the writing of the Constitution, that they thought of a natural born citizen as someone born in this country of two citizen parents at the time of that person’s birth. SR 511 appears to harbor similar assumptions. This has been repeatedly confirmed by Congress and the Supreme Court. However, CRS wrote a very misleading memo about eligibility, distorting both facts and case law, particularly Minor vs. Happersett. This has been documented in several articles, which we will forward upon request.

3. The withholding of “Obama’s” vital papers and expenditure of possibly up to $2MM to defend him in eligibility legal actions, plus an undetermined amount from DOJ funds, is an outrage. They should have been prosecuting, not defending him.

4. There is documented, indisputable evidence, compiled by multiple independent private investigators (Sankey, Daniels and others), that:
- “Obama” is linked at least 16 stolen Social Security numbers, including 042-68-4425, via name and addresses.
- This was uncovered via commercial databases and other research.
- That led to a finding that his Selective Service registration, linked to the aforementioned Social Security number, is also fraudulent and apparently forged circa 2008.
- At least one of his purported mother’s Social Security numbers appears to be stolen.
- We are told by investigators that this normally happens either when people cannot obtain such documentation legally, or are using it to break the law, usually for financial gain or other felony fraud.

5. There is no record of him ever legally changing his name from Barry Soetoro or Soebarkah to his current AKA. There is also evidence linking him to an alias of Harrison Bounel.

6. The so-called birth certificate was, after over three years of stalling. finally released in digital form by “Obama,” via the White House staff, on 4-27-11, with limited copies made from an undetermined source document. It has been declared a fraud by dozens of document experts, some of them very well-known and respected. In short, it opens up in Adobe Illustrator as a nine-layered document, displaying numerous symptoms known to experts as evidence of alteration.

7. John McCain was submitted to an extensive investigation and humiliating Senate hearing, on his eligibility for the Presidency, in spite of having a very well-documented history and two American citizen parents. His family has served with distinction as military officers for multiple generations. Even though he was born in Panama (NOT the at the time Canal Zone, a U.S. Possession, as many thought), he was declared eligible, because his father was serving his country as a military officer, a special case. No such hearing was ever held for his Democrat opponent, who had far more mysterious circumstances in his past and had already been served for eligibility suits. Some say this was some sort of quid pro quo. Whatever.

8. You didn’t raise the issue in your letter, but the so-called “birth announcements”:
- Are unvetted
- Are not legal documents
- Could have been triggered via relatives in a request, or Certification (NOT Certificate) of Live Birth, obtained with only an affidavit, under Hawaiian law.
- Do not state the name of the child
- Do not state the place of birth
- List a false address, where the parents never lived

Congress and courts have both failed to act on the issues, to date. The Courts claim it’s Congress’ responsibility and Congress vice- versa. You say it’s a non-issue. About half of the public at large surveyed think otherwise.

We do NOT intend to roll over and let this go away. The stakes are way too high. The founders established a high bar for eligibility, precisely to help avoid situations like we have now, with a chief executive whose priorities, loyalties, ideology and revered traditions clearly do not stand with We The People. This and his many impeachable offenses, are far worse than Watergate and Monicagate to the nth power.

We hope and pray that you will have the courage to act, to motivate the House of Reps to investigate this and act accordingly. I also ask you to help motivate the FBI to move on the multiple complaints submitted.

We do not think it is sufficient to wait until January 2013 to solve the problem, particularly because he has been so very dangerous and destructive in office and seems willing to commit massive fraud to get his way, with powerful forces enabling him to do so.

Regards,

G. Miller

———————————

Dear Rep. McLintock,

I read your letter to “redacted” on the Post and Email website and would like to share the following. You said that President Obama was thoroughly vetted and found clean. I don’t think so. You may have forgotten Senate Resolution 511 which vetted Sen. McCain on being a natural born citizen. He was cleared and his nomination accepted by Democrats. But here’s what you and so many others are missing. During one of the hearings on Res. 511 Sen. Patrick Leahy said, “Because he (McCain) was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen.” Obviously, “born to American citizens” means that both parents are U.S. citizens, which McCain’s parents were. But by this statement, Sen. Leahy admitted that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Art. 2, Sect. 1, Clause 5 of the constitution. This appeared to be a thoughtless “oops” that went unnoticed. But according to the historical record and Surpeme Court rulings, Leahy is dead on. Obama is not eligible to be President of the United States because his father was Kenyan and never was a U.S. citizen. McCain must have known this, but why didn’t he bring it up? And why didn’t he and Republicans demand that Sen. Obama be vetted for natural born citizenship also? Those questions need to be answered, but try and get one. The real substance of natural born citizenship is citizen parents and Leahy nailed it. So you are wrong, sir, when you say that Barack Obama was thoroughly vetted. He has committed election fraud and is guilty of usurping the presidency, among other things. Check with Senator Leahy and see if he still believes a natural born citizen is born of parents who are BOTH “American citizens.”

Regards, J. Black

HAWAII CLAIMS “PRIVACY”

HAWAII CLAIMS “PRIVACY” PREVENTS RELEASE OF OBAMA’S ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE; TAITZ DEMANDS IT AS PART OF DISCOVERY

by Sharon Rondeau

Judge Royce Lamberth is presiding over the lawsuit Taitz v. Astrue which seeks the disclosure of Obama's original social security number application

(Jul. 7, 2011) — Orly Taitz has filed and posted on her website a “Motion to Compel Subpoena” in regard to the lawsuit Taitz v. Astrue filed in February 2011 against the Social Security Administration to obtain a copy of Obama’s social security number application.  Taitz is requesting that the “vault” original allegedly on file with the Hawaii Department of Health be released as part of the discovery phase of her case.

The Hawaii Department of Health does not display the purported long-form birth certificate bearing the name of Barack Hussein Obama II on its website, but rather, states that only index data is available according to state law.  The “document” released to the public on April 27, 2011 after almost three years of stonewalling has been denounced by experts as a forgery.

Former Weather Underground domestic terrorist and co-worker with Obama at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge William Ayers has admitted to stealing and creating false identities, including names, social security numbers and birth certificates of deceased children.

DR. TAITZ: I have filed two subpoenas.  There are two types of subpoenas:  one that is issued by an attorney and one that is issued by the court.  The Hawaii Department of Health refused to comply with the first one which was signed by me as an attorney.  In response, I have filed a Motion to Compel.  Meanwhile, if they comply with the second subpoena signed by the clerk of the court, then I can withdraw the Motion to Compel.

If they don’t comply with the second subpoena as well, then I can file another supplemental brief saying, “Your Honor, the first subpoena was not complied with, and the second signed by the clerk of the court has also been refused.”  So I am trying to stay a few steps ahead and not waste time.

MRS. RONDEAU: Can someone fail to respond to a court-ordered supoena?

DR. TAITZ: They did respond.  There was a response to the first subpoena by the Hawaii Attorney General, which I posted on my website.  They stated that they are not complying with the first subpoena due to considerations of privacy.  So I issued the second subpoena which is signed by the clerk of the court.  Meanwhile, I can file a Motion to Compel to the first one, and a few things can happen:  the judge might decide to dismiss this case, and then the subpoena will be moot.  We had this happen before.  The judge might decide to grant a Motion to Compel.  The judge might say that the subpoena which was issued by the court should be answered, or he might decline to grant a Motion to Compel.  So we need to see what will happen.  I’m doing the maximum amount possible.

They have an attorney, the Attorney General of Hawaii, who represents the Department of Health, and he can file an Opposition to Subpoena.  If he files an Opposition to the first subpoena, I have sent the second one to him.  It is too soon to have heard from him yet on that.  He could file an Opposition or a Motion to Quash the subpoena.  Then I would need to respond by either a Motion to Compel or by an Opposition to their Motion to Quash the subpoena.

Sometimes people file frivolous subpoenas.  In our case, they have a right to oppose, and the judge would have to decide.  I have filed the Motion to Compel with the judge whom I have for my FOIA case, which was to obtain the application for the social security that Obama is using.  Typically, people who don’t have a valid birth certificate resort to using fraudulent social security numbers.  That’s why this is relevant, and that’s why I issued that subpoena to compel them.  There are a lot of things that can be done.  Keep in mind that there is a lot of pressure on this judge to dismiss the case.

What I feel is that I am providing more and more information, clear evidence of fraud regarding the birth certificate and his social security number.  I have also provided information from the Social Security Administration regarding his mother’s social security number application, which is clearly a fraudulent document.  I am getting such explosive information that the dam will have to break somewhere.  It is possible that the judge will allow the evidence of fraud and forgery in his court or he could dismiss it.  They know if this breaks and it becomes obvious that they had all of this evidence, they could be held liable; they could be prosecuted.  So I believe that the judges are worried today because of what has happened.

MRS. RONDEAU: Could a judge in Hawaii become involved?

DR. TAITZ: That’s another possibility.  I assure you that I will not leave a stone unturned.  Since the judge in Washington, DC has already found standing and we have discovery, I don’t want this opportunity to be lost.  I want to take full advantage of it.  But if the judge in DC says that it has to be resolved in Hawaii, then I will refile it in Hawaii.  I will have to wait, because we have to give the government time.  But right now, we have an ongoing case.  Two subpoenas have been issued, we have discovery, and now I have filed the Motion to Compel.  I want do the maximum I can with this case.

Birther Summit Will Enhance All Current Eligibility Efforts

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

by Dean Haskins, ©The Birther Summit, 2011

A new organization is planning a nationwide function for March 2012 focusing on Obama's apparent ineligibility for the presidency

(Jul. 7, 2011) — A firestorm is brewing as the world is becoming aware that an event is being planned in which the people of America will join en masse to force Washington to take note that we will not be ignored about Barack Obama’s ineligibility to hold the office of president of the United States, the fraud that has been committed to hide that fact, or the stonewalling tactics that have been employed by Congress and the courts for nearly three years.

The Birther Summit’s Operations Team understands the general desire for immediacy in this effort, as that has been everyone’s sentiment since before the faux inauguration in January 2009. However, anyone familiar with the design and implementation of such a large-scale event knows the sheer volume of details that must be planned and implemented for a grand event like this to even hope for success, let alone accomplish its historic mission.

While no specific date has been formally set, we have begun focusing on the month of March, believing that such a date will allow sufficient time to insure a positive outcome.

In light of that, we want to expound our understanding as to the Birther Summit’s place in relation to the entire eligibility movement. We do NOT want the summit to be perceived as a movement in, and of, itself; nor do we believe the upcoming summit should replace any of the numerous actions people across the country are doing daily. Those actions are necessary, and should not stop, or be lessened, in anticipation of the Birther Summit. In fact, they should actually increase as the date for the summit looms ever closer.

The Birther Summit is a tool for us all to use—to remind our public officials that we will remain in their faces over this, and also to pique the curiosity of those who might not currently understand the constitutional crisis that still exists.

The Birther Summit is also a tool to show the unity of our movement—that we are focused on the legal resolution of the crimes that have been committed against our nation. That is the reason behind the merchandise that is being offered, for, with the growing public use of the merchandise, the message we have been trying to make heard can make its way into every facet of American life. While every bit of the proceeds derived from the merchandise will help with the unimaginable expense that will be incurred by the Birther Summit, we only receive a very small percentage of each item’s purchase price. But, every penny will help, as the costs associated with this event will be astronomical.

As the plan and structure of this three-day event become finalized, we will be rolling out increasingly greater marketing efforts throughout the country, and will force our way into the common, everyday language of Americans. We will be lauded, and we will be hated; but, WE WILL BE. We are already receiving messages from across the country from people who want to be a part of this historic event, and as our message is disseminated to even greater numbers of people, knowledge of the upcoming Birther Summit will blanket the land. The Birther Summit website is already largely exceeding the traffic we initially anticipated at this point in our infancy.

The Birther Summit is an event for Americans to force Washington to stop ignoring our demands for redress of grievances, it is a tool for growing numbers of our citizens to understand the serious nature of the crimes that have been committed against our country and our Constitution, it is point of unity for the entire movement, and it is a source of support for the the various actions that are presently being taken by groups and individuals.

###

If you would like more information about this event, please visit our website often at www.birthersummit.org. To schedule an interview with the event’s Executive Director, please email dean@birthersummit.org.

Contact: Dean C. Haskins
434.426.7202
dean@birthersummit.org

(c)2011 The Birther Summit
www.birthersummit.org